The British government accepts that colonial forces in Kenya tortured and abused detainees during the Mau Mau rebellion, the High Court has heard.

Three victims of torture during Kenya's 1950s Mau Mau uprising have given evidence to the high court in their bid to win damages.
Last
year, the elderly Kenyans won a ruling from Mr Justice McCombe that
they had "arguable cases in law", but they are now facing the British
government's claim that the actions were brought outside the legal time
limit.
Wambugu Wa NyingiKenyan, Mau Mau claimant
Their lawyers say it is an exceptional case in which the judge should exercise his discretion in their favour.
Wambugu
Wa Nyingi, Paulo Muoka Nzili and Jane Muthoni Mara spoke through
interpreters as they were questioned on Tuesday about statements they
had provided.
Each was told in turn by Guy Mansfield QC for the
Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) that the government did not
dispute they suffered "torture and other ill-treatment at the hands of
the colonial administration".
In his written evidence, Nyingi, 84,
a father of 16 who..
still works as a casual labourer, said he was
arrested on Christmas Eve 1952 and detained for about nine years.
During
that time, he was beaten unconscious in an incident in 1959 at Hola
camp in which 11 men were clubbed to death, and he still bears marks
from leg manacles, whipping and caning. He said: "When I was released I
would have nightmares about three times a week. I would dream about the
murder of people at Hola. These nightmares continued for about four
years.
"When people talk about the Mau Mau or the colonial era I
think about the terrible events I lived through. When these thoughts are
triggered I get so sad and stressed about what happened that I develop a
headache and I cannot work.
"I feel I was robbed of my youth and
that I did not get to do the things I should have done as a young man.
There is a saying in Gikuyu that old age lives off the years of youth
but I have nothing to live off because my youth was taken from me."
Nyingi
said the anti-colonial Mau Mau were banned in Kenya until 2003 and he
had no idea about the possibility of compensation until he was
interviewed by the Kenya Human Rights Commission in 2006.
"I have
brought this case because I want the world to know about the years I
have lost and what was taken from a generation of Kenyans.
"If I
could speak to the Queen I would say that Britain did many good things
in Kenya but that they also did many bad things. The settlers took our
land, they killed our people and they burnt down our houses," he added.
"In
the years before independence people were beaten, their land was
stolen, women were raped, men were castrated and their children were
killed.
"I do not hold her personally responsible but I would like
the wrongs which were done to me and other Kenyans to be recognised by
the British government so that I can die in peace."
The trio want
an apology and a Mau Mau welfare fund to ensure they and other victims
can live with an element of dignity in their final days.
Nzili,
85, said in his statement that he was a herdsman when he was abducted
into the forest by the Mau Mau in 1957, but he managed to leave them and
get to Nairobi where he was arrested.
On the fourth day of his
stay at nearby Embakasi camp, he was stripped, chained and castrated by
having the veins of his testicles cut with large pliers used on cows.
"After
I was castrated I thought I had been cut off from any sexual life and
that I would never be able to marry and have children, which is a man's
pride. I felt completely destroyed and without hope.
"I could not
see what the future held for me. I was useless and felt genuinely that
it was better for me to die. It took years for me to find any hope but I
have never really recovered from what was done to me at Embakasi on
that day."
"What has affected me most from this is that I have
been made to feel like I am like a woman. I have never had children of
my own and never will have. I am unable to have sexual relations with my
wife."
He said that he lived on about £1 a week and would like some form of compensation so he could live with less hardship.
In
her statement, Mara, 73, said she was 15 when she was taken to Gatithi
detention camp, where she was beaten with sticks and a gun butt and had
her legs stamped on.
On the second day, during questioning about
her brother and the Mau Mau, she was held down while a glass bottle
containing very hot water was pushed into her vagina.
She felt
"completely and utterly violated" and was forced to watch the same
sexual torture, using larger bottles, inflicted on three older women,
who had borne children. These women died shortly after their release.
She
added: "I want the British government to compensate me for the
suffering I have been caused as a result of the abuse I was subjected to
in the camps. The abuse has affected my whole life and I relive the
events I lived through on a regular basis.
"I do not understand
why I was treated with such brutality for simply having provided food to
the Mau Mau. I killed no one, I harmed no one, all I wanted to do was
to help those who were fighting for the dignity and freedom of our
people."
Mansfield has said the FCO faced "irredeemable
difficulties" in relation to the availability of witnesses and
documents. It would have wished to call those in senior positions in the
Colonial Office, War Office, British army and the Kenyan colonial
administration – but the majority of those who might give material
evidence are now dead.
"Without those witnesses, and indeed with
the necessarily limited recollections of those who do survive, the very
complicated and difficult task of determining the competing factual
positions cannot be fairly conducted."
No comments:
Post a Comment